The $2 off Huggies wipes 320 ct or larger coupon is back! (Leave zip blank and click on household).
There is actually a good deal at CVS this week:
Buy(2) 360 ct Huggies Wipes for $17.98
Use (2) $2/1 coupons
and Get $3 ECB
Final Price: $10.98 for 720 wipes
That works out to .015 per wipe which is a great price (that would be like paying $.98 for a 64ct tub of wipes)
If you don’t want to head to CVS, the deal for Pampers wipes is still available on Amazon. You can get a 720 ct box for $12.94 with free 2 day shipping. That works out to .017 per wipe- you will need to choose the subscribe and save option on the right side or if you are enrolled in Amazon Mom– you should get this price automatically.
(NOTE: You need to enroll in AmazonMom first to get the discounted price. If you elect to do subscribe and save instead, just be sure to go back into your account and cancel this as soon as your wipes arrive. It is a very easy process and there are no strings attached.)
Thanks Franki!
monica says
to make this even better, scan your card! I didnt scan it when I got there, but on my receipt when I paid my prescription I got a 5 off 15 (valid only 3 days) and a 4 off 20! how great is that? 😀
cjs says
Also, just an fyi…the Coupon Machine has been spitting out $4/$20 coupons like there is no tomorrow (at least for me & my sister here in Nor. Cal.). If you need another $2.02 in items, and are lucky enough to get a coupon, it is a great deal too!
Serena Ames says
Will it work if you already did the diaper deal?
Charlene says
Serena I don’t think so. It is a limit of one ECB per card. You might just have a look at your receipt to double check- it will say limit reached next to the diapers.
Mollie says
Do you know how this plays out for the BOGO 50% at Rite Aid this week? Is the deal better at CVS?
Charlene says
Mollie I don’t know the price at Rite Aid. Online they only have up to 216ct and those are a shocking $15.99. The coupon would need to be for a 320 ct or more so I think it might be really outrageous.
Mollie says
I thought that might be the case. Thanks, Charlene!